VDA 6.8 Supply Chain Process Audit

VDA 6.8 is a process-based audit standard developed by the German Automotive Industry (VDA) to assess indirect service providers whose activities influence product quality, safety, or delivery performance.

Unlike production-focused audits, VDA 6.8 targets services such as logistics, IT, engineering, testing, and maintenance, using a risk-based, maturity-oriented approach aligned with OEM expectations.

This guide breaks down what VDA 6.8 is, why it matters, and how audits are structured, in a clear, practical, and audit-ready format.


๐ŸŽฏ What Is VDA 6.8?

VDA 6.8 is an audit standard for service processes in the automotive supply chain.

It focuses on:

  • process stability
  • risk management
  • service performance
  • data and information security
  • continuous improvement

VDA 6.8 ensures that non-production activities do not create hidden quality risks for OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers.

โœ” Applies to external and internal service providers
โœ” Used mainly by German OEMs (VW, BMW, Daimler, etc.)
โœ” Not a certification standard โ€” audit & evaluation only


๐Ÿงฉ Who Must Comply with VDA 6.8?

VDA 6.8 applies to organizations providing indirect services with potential impact on the final product.

Typical examples include:

  • ๐Ÿšš Logistics & transport providers
  • ๐Ÿ’ป IT infrastructure & software development
  • ๐Ÿง  Engineering & design services
  • ๐Ÿงช Testing, validation, and calibration laboratories
  • ๐Ÿ”ง Maintenance & technical services
  • ๐Ÿ“ฆ Packaging, labeling, warehousing
  • ๐ŸŽ“ Technical training providers

๐Ÿ‘‰ Key criterion:
If the service can affect quality, safety, compliance, delivery, or OEM data, VDA 6.8 applies.


๐Ÿ—๏ธ The Core Structure of VDA 6.8

Similar to other VDA standards, VDA 6.8 follows a process-oriented audit structure, focused on maturity and risk control.


๐Ÿ›๏ธ 1. Organization & Management Responsibility

This pillar evaluates leadership, structure, and governance.

Auditors expect:

  • a clear organizational setup
  • defined responsibilities
  • measurable objectives
  • management involvement

โœ… Typical evidence:

  • organization chart
  • job descriptions
  • quality policy
  • management review records
  • risk assessments

โŒ Common gaps:

  • unclear process ownership
  • objectives without KPIs
  • management review done โ€œonly on paperโ€

๐Ÿ‘ฅ 2. Resource & Competence Management

Service quality depends heavily on people and know-how.

Auditors verify:

  • employee competence
  • training and qualification
  • availability of key resources
  • workload and capacity planning

โœ… Expected tools:

  • competence matrix
  • training plan & records
  • qualification approvals
  • performance evaluations

โŒ Frequent issues:

  • โ€œon-the-jobโ€ training without validation
  • no requalification after changes
  • subcontracted work without competence control

โš™๏ธ 3. Service Process Management (Core of VDA 6.8)

This is the most critical section of the audit.

Auditors assess whether:

  • service processes are defined and standardized
  • risks are identified before execution
  • changes are controlled
  • performance is measured

โœ… Expected elements:

  • process flowcharts
  • risk analysis (FMEA, risk matrix)
  • service KPIs
  • SLAs and service specifications
  • documentation and traceability

โŒ Typical nonconformities:

  • undocumented processes
  • no risk evaluation for services
  • dependence on individual knowledge
  • missing traceability of service execution

๐Ÿ” 4. Change Management & Complaint Handling

Uncontrolled changes are one of the biggest risks in service processes.

VDA 6.8 requires:

  • formal change management
  • impact and risk analysis
  • customer notification and approval
  • structured complaint handling

โœ… Examples of critical changes:

  • IT system updates
  • tool or software changes
  • relocation or outsourcing
  • key personnel replacement

โœ… Accepted methods:

  • PDCA
  • 8D
  • 5 Why
  • Ishikawa analysis

๐Ÿค 5. Supplier & Subcontractor Management

If a service provider uses subcontractors, responsibility remains 100% internal.

Auditors check:

  • supplier selection criteria
  • monitoring and evaluation
  • audit of subcontractors (if critical)
  • contractual and NDA compliance

โœ… Evidence:

  • supplier scorecards
  • audit reports
  • performance reviews
  • confidentiality agreements

๐Ÿ” 6. Information Management & Data Security

This section is mandatory for IT, software, engineering, and labs.

Auditors expect:

  • protection of OEM data
  • controlled access to information
  • backup and recovery plans
  • employee awareness

โœ… Typical evidence:

  • IT security policies
  • role-based access control
  • backup logs
  • recovery tests
  • awareness training

๐Ÿ”— Strong alignment with ISO 27001


๐Ÿ“Š 7. Performance Monitoring & Continuous Improvement

A mature VDA 6.8 supplier:

  • measures service performance
  • analyzes deviations
  • improves processes continuously

โœ… Typical KPIs:

  • on-time delivery of services
  • incident rate
  • customer complaints
  • system availability
  • response time

Improvement must be systematic, not reactive.


๐Ÿงฎ How Is a VDA 6.8 Audit Evaluated?

The VDA 6.8 audit uses a standardized questionnaire and scoring system.

Scoring interpretation:

  • โœ… โ‰ฅ 90% โ€“ very robust service provider
  • โš ๏ธ 80โ€“89% โ€“ acceptable, improvement actions required
  • โŒ < 80% โ€“ high risk, not acceptable

๐ŸŒŸ Why VDA 6.8 Matters

Implementing VDA 6.8 helps organizations:

  • control indirect quality risks
  • gain OEM confidence
  • improve service stability
  • prevent data and compliance incidents
  • differentiate from competitors

๐Ÿงพ Final Thoughts

VDA 6.8 recognizes a critical reality of modern automotive operations:
services can be just as risky as production processes.

By applying structured audits, risk-based thinking, and performance monitoring, VDA 6.8 ensures that indirect service providers actively support quality โ€” instead of undermining it.

Alin Nedelcu
Alin Nedelcu
Articles: 28

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *