PPAP vs PPA (AIAG vs VDA)

Production Part Approval Process vs Part Production Approval (AIAG vs VDA)

πŸ” Key Differences at a Glance

CategoryPPAP (AIAG)PPA (VDA)
StructureBased on documentation volumeBased on product sampling + risk
Standard LevelLevel 3 (full PPAP)Level B or C, depending on OEM
Audit RequirementsOnly in Level 5Level D includes mandatory audit
Customer-SpecificDefined in Level 4 or appendixIntegrated into each PPA kickoff
FMEA & Control PlanIncluded in Level 3+Always required for critical parts
Measurement ResultsDimensional + MSA in Level 3+Test results mandatory from Level B up

βœ… Summary Tip

  • AIAG PPAPis more template-driven and structured around documents.
  • VDA PPA is more risk-based, with sampling levels assigned based on part type and maturity.
  • For global suppliers, understanding and aligning both systems is critical to meet OEM expectations.

πŸ†š AIAG vs VDA Submission Levels – Documentation Requirements

AspectAIAG PPAP (Levels 1–5)VDA PPA (Sampling Levels A–D)
StructureFixed 18-element checklist defined by AIAG (PPAP Manual 4th Edition)Documentation tailored to part maturity, risk level, and OEM-specific rules
Documentation PhilosophySubmit standardized package (often PDF or electronic format)Deliver documents in phases or gates (linked to milestones in the project)
Submission Level 1Only PSW (Part Submission Warrant) – no supporting documentsLevel A: Product samples only – no documentation required
Submission Level 2PSW + selected supporting documents (e.g. dimensional results, MSA, material tests)Not directly equivalent – usually handled case-by-case
Submission Level 3 (default)PSW + full set of 18 elements (FMEAs, control plan, MSA, dimensional, capability, test results, etc.)Roughly similar to Level C – includes all test results, FMEAs, and control plan
Submission Level 4PSW + only documents specifically requested by the customerSimilar to customized submissions depending on PPA agreement
Submission Level 5PSW + all 18 elements + on-site audit of documentation and processLevel D: Like Level C plus full customer audit or in-person review
Document Approval FormatStandard PSW form signed by supplier quality rep, sometimes digitalFormal sign-off process may include OEM portal or structured checklist (e.g., VW Formel-Q)
Document FormatUsually Excel/PDF templates (FMEA, control plan, MSA) aligned with AIAG formatsOften VDA-structured FMEA (5-step method), and control plan integrated into OEM-defined formats
Traceability FocusPSW and document version controlFull traceability via maturity level tracking and versioned approvals
Language RequirementsUsually English (or customer’s preferred language)Often German required, especially for German OEMs

πŸ“˜ Example: PPAP Level 3 vs VDA PPA Level C – What You Submit

DocumentAIAG PPAP Level 3VDA PPA Level C
Design Recordsβœ… Requiredβœ… Required
Engineering Change Docsβœ… Requiredβœ… Required
DFMEA / PFMEAβœ… AIAG formatβœ… VDA format (5-step logic)
Control Planβœ… Based on key characteristicsβœ… Aligned with risk assessment
Measurement System Analysisβœ… Full Gage R&R and biasβœ… Equivalent tests (not always called MSA)
Dimensional Resultsβœ… Requiredβœ… Required
Initial Process Capabilityβœ… Cp, Cpkβœ… Capability or functional testing
Test Reportsβœ… Material & performance resultsβœ… Functional/durability test results
Appearance Approval Reportβœ… If applicableβœ… If applicable
Part Submission Warrantβœ… Central approval doc🚫 Not used – replaced by formal release process
Master Samplesβœ… Requiredβœ… Required
Documentation Archiveβœ… Supplier holds copiesβœ… Structured and reviewed in project

βœ… Key Takeaways

  • AIAG (PPAP) uses a static, checklist-driven document approach: 18 predefined elements, submitted together (especially in Level 3).
  • VDA (PPA) uses a dynamic, phase-based approval process, with documents reviewed progressively based on risk and complexity.
  • AIAG = one package, VDA = gated documentation aligned to project steps (e.g., Planning β†’ Realization β†’ Production).
  • In Level 5 (AIAG) and Level D (VDA), customer audits and full traceability are expected, including a review of all documentation.

Alin Nedelcu
Alin Nedelcu
Articles: 24

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *